Did you mean invalid reasons?Ian Forbes;398054 said:Thanks for remembering the name of that movie... "Devil's Own"
It was a sad but exciting movie, and at the same time where you are "pulling" for the "terrorist", despite his valid reasons.
See that is the crux of the reason why things like that can’t be discussed because more often than not the person you are discussing/arguing with will never accept the fact that the reasons are valid despite an outcome. I understand that point of view but cannot accept it.
But the Palestinian situation is way more polarizing. When people argue that mortar attacks and machine guns against children with stones is valid rules of armed conflict means I can’t debate.
Loved devils own. Huge fan of brad Pitt and was quite a realistic portrayal based on when I lived in Yonkers.
But my lips are sealed and my Irish eyes are smiling even after spurs lost.